![]() ![]() Ostensibly, it is to allow board partners to differentiate in coolers and performance, but it might have benefited NVIDIA in the initial comparison to AMD's Radeon R9 285. That is really impressive but, at the same time, makes me wonder why NVIDIA would consistently leave that much performance on the table. First, the 1576 MHz maximum Boost clock is 33.7% faster than the "typical" Boost clock of 1178 MHz on the reference GTX 960 specifications. There are also a couple of interesting closing facts for you to consider. But at least now you know where your own GTX 960 card sits based on our days of testing. Just because you get a product that is only hitting around 1500 MHz does not make it a warranty concern. That temperature is a good margin away from the 80C target that NVIDIA defaults to.Īs is always the case, overclocking capability is never guaranteed by the card vendor. The coolers from ASUS and MSI are definitely doing a better job of keeping the GPU cool, but there is absolutely nothing wrong with the 75C level that EVGA reaches. Temperatures on the overclocked cards ranged from 61C to 75C with the EVGA SSC card the only one to get above the 70C mark. The next largest gap we see in consecutive results is 15 MHz, going from 1504 MHz to 1519 MHz on the far left. The 1576 MHz result is also the biggest outlier – it differs from its immediate neighbor by 18 MHz. The best result was a 1576 MHz overclock, also from an MSI card, which should show you right away that picking a particular hardware vendor with the hopes of getting the "best" overclocker just isn't the way to think about it. The worst result in our overclocking testing game with one of the four MSI GTX 960 100ME/Gaming graphics cards, hitting just 1501 MHz. Remember that the reference base clock of the GTX 960 is 1127 MHz and the reference Boost clock is 1178 MHz – that should help put these overclocks in perspective. There is a secondary blue line that is overlaid, which shows the peak temperature of the GPU during that overclocked period (with a scale on the right side of the graph). First up is the GPU clock rate, sorted by lowest to highest peak overclock. Obviously, to be 100% sure of the stability of any overclock, you should burn-in each card for a longer period of time, but the task of getting through 13 cards forced us to lower it down to something more reasonable.Īfter many hours of testing, the results are shown in the two graphs below. To be deemed "stable", the test run had to complete five complete iterations, which is equivalent to about 15 minutes of game time. #Gigabyte overclocking with evga precision x PcOur stability testing was done with Metro: Last Light, a demanding PC game that quickly allows us to enter a repeating benchmark mode. Hence, we are only reporting a single maximum GPU and memory clock speed for each card. ![]() In my testing the GPUs were able to maintain their peak clock rate in perpetuity – they don't seem to waver or bounce around in the way we are used to seeing cards like the GTX 780 do. Because the three different GTX 960 options have different starting base and Boost clocks, our offsets ranged from +210 MHz down to +140 MHz, though the resulting clock rates are very close. Rather than reporting GPU or memory offset results, our graphs will show the peak frequency that was reached as a result of the offset. (The only difference between the Gaming and 100ME MSI cards is the color of the cooler.) The ASUS models are all STRIX models, the EVGA cards are of the SSC variety, and the MSI cards include a single Gaming model and three 100ME. Our collection of thirteen GTX 960 cards includes a handful from ASUS, EVGA and MSI. I think you will find the data interesting. Hopefully we will be able to provide a solid base of knowledge for buyers of the GTX 960 that we don't normally have the opportunity to offer: what is the range of overclocking you can expect and what is the average or median result. #Gigabyte overclocking with evga precision x plusAn interesting idea was proposed during the event – what would happen if we tried to overclock all of the product NVIDIA had brought along to see what the distribution of results looked like? After notifying all the winners of their prizes and asking for permission from each, we started the arduous process of testing and overclocking a total of 13 (10 prizes plus our 3 retail units already in the office) different GTX 960 cards. During the event, NVIDIA and its partners provided ten GTX 960 cards for our live viewers to win which we handed out through about an hour and a half. A baker’s dozen of GTX 960 When you have this kind of hardware on hand, you might as well overclock it.īack on the launch day of the GeForce GTX 960, we hosted NVIDIA's Tom Petersen for a live stream. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |